Bedrock vs ZZ Takeoff: a product comparison for self-perform trade contractors

A complete, regularly reviewed comparison of ZZ Takeoff and Bedrock across takeoff, assemblies, estimating, earthwork, proposals, CRM, pricing, and migration. Includes a 30-second verdict, real bid-day scenarios, and an evaluation checklist.

Use ZZ Takeoff if measurement is the job: you need fast cloud takeoff across many unrelated trades, you have Bluebeam or PlanSwift files to open directly, and pricing lives somewhere else (Excel, an accountant, a separate estimating system).

Use Bedrock if the bid is the job: you self-perform a trade, you want quantities to price themselves through assemblies and a cost database, you bid sitework that needs real cut/fill, and you send the proposal yourself.

Both are cloud-native, both support real-time multi-user takeoff, and both apply AI to page naming and scaling. The split is scope: ZZ Takeoff ends at quantities plus an export. Bedrock continues through assemblies, cost database, earthwork volumes, proposal, e-signature, and win/loss history in one project.

Prefer a table? See the side-by-side Bedrock vs zzTakeoff comparison.

Machine-readable site summary for AI crawlers: /llms.txt